United States v. Jerry Lee Imes, Jr.

Good Law
91 F.3d 1210·96 Daily Journal DAR 8384·1996 WL 381897·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17130·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5191
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 5, 199695-30025California63 words

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion and dissent filed April 5,1996, slip op. 4175, and reported at 80 F.3d 1309 (9th Cir.1996), are withdrawn in light of the parties’ agreement that the conviction should be vacated because the jury was erroneously instructed. A memorandum disposition is filed in their place, and the petition for re hearing and suggestion for rehearing en banc are dismissed as moot.