United States v. Northrop Corporation

Good Law
91 F.3d 1211·96 Daily Journal DAR 9024·11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1713·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18377·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5510
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199695-55175California4,456 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 1211 65 USLW 2097 , 11 IER Cases 1713 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5510, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9024 UNITED STATES, ex rel., Michael A. (Brian) HYATT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHROP CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; Kulite Semiconductor Products, Inc., a business organization, form Unknown; Kulite, a business organization, form Unknown; Solid State Devices, Inc., a California corporation; Cal-Doran Metallurgical Services, Inc., a California corporation, d/b/a Cal-Doran Heat Treating Company of Los Angeles, d/b/a Southern California Aluminum Heat Treating Company; Cal-Doran Heat Treating Company, a business organization, form Unknown; Southern California Aluminum Heat Treating Company, a business organization, form Unknown, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 3, 1996. Decided July 26, 1996. Phillip E. Benson, Law Offices of Phillip E. Benson, Newport Beach, California, and Linda R. Maclean, Claremont, California, for plaintiff-appellant. Marc A. Becker, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, California; Richard C. Goodman, Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth, Newport Beach, California; Peter B.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.