Jon L. George v. Pacific-Csc Work Furlough

Good Law
91 F.3d 1227·96 Daily Journal DAR 9185·11 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1753·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18759·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5634
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 199694-56098California2,234 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 1227 11 IER Cases 1753 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5634 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9185 Jon L. GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PACIFIC-CSC WORK FURLOUGH, a California Corporation; Siraaj Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation, dba Pacific Placement Facility and/or Pacific Furlough Activity; Ernest H. Ernest, II; Steve J. Overstreet; Sinclair Bean, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1996. Decided July 31, 1996. Donal M. Hill, San Diego, California, for plaintiff-appellant. R. Michael Jordan, Ault, Deuprey, Jones & Gorman, San Diego, California, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-1228-G/RMB. Before: BROWNING, WALLACE and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 George brought six claims against his former employer, Pacific-CSC Work Furlough Facility a/k/a Pacific Placement Facility (Pacific). The first two were federal pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The district court ordered George to amend these claims to allege recognizable state action. George failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.