96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5677, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9329 Shirley D. Keenan Daniel E. Keenan v. Wallace E. Allan Janis M. Whitener-Moberg County of Grant, by and Through the Grant County District Court of the Grant County Board of Commissioners Helen Fancher, Leroy Allison, and Tim Snead, Personally and in Their Representative Capacities as Members of the Grant County Board of County Commissioners, Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct

Good Law
91 F.3d 1275
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 199695-35577California4,093 words

Opinion

Opinion

91 F.3d 1275 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5677 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9329 Shirley D. KEENAN; Daniel E. Keenan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Wallace E. ALLAN; Janis M. Whitener-Moberg; County of Grant, by and through the Grant County District Court of the Grant County Board of Commissioners; Helen Fancher, Leroy Allison, and Tim Snead, personally and in their representative capacities as members of the Grant County Board of County Commissioners, Defendants-Appellees, Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct, Appellee. No. 95-35577. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 6, 1996. Decided Aug. 1, 1996. Robert A. Dunn, McCormick, Dunn & Black, Spokane, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellants. John Francis Kennedy and Ellen R. Donovan, Law Offices of John Francis Kennedy, Tacoma, Washington, for defendant-appellee Allan. Daniel W. Ferm and Sheryl J. Willert, Williams, Kastner & Gibbs, Seattle, Washington, for defendant-appellee Whitener-Moberg. Daniel E. Huntington, Richter-Wimberley, Spokane, Washington, for defendants-appellees Grant County, Fancher, Allison and Snead. Peter D. Byrnes and Paul R. Taylor, Byrnes and Keller, Seattle, Washington, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.