Dell Hackett, and Other Similarly Situated Employees Eric R. Langford v. Lane County

Good Law
91 F.3d 1289·96 Daily Journal DAR 9405·1996 WL 431718·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18996·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5738
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 199695-35283California1,717 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

This is an action for overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 . Plaintiffs are supervisory officers in the Lane County Sheriffs Office. The FLSA contains an exemption from its overtime pay requirements for “bona fide executive, administrative, or professional” personnel. 29 U.S.C. § 213 (a)(1). The applicability of that exemption to public employees has been the subject of much litigation in this circuit in recent years. See, e.g., Barner v. City of Novato, 17 F.3d 1256 (9th Cir.1994); McGuire v. City of Portland, Oregon, 91 F.3d 1293 (9th Cir.1996) (filed this day). In order for Lane County to elaim this exemption, the employees must meet both a so-called “duties” test and a “salary” test. See generally, 29 C.F.R. § 541 ; Barner, 17 F.3d at 1259-1260 . That the plaintiffs meet the duties test because they are either administrative or executive employees is undisputed. At issue here, as in other recent cases, is whether plaintiffs meet the requirements of the salary test.

The salary test generally requires that an employee receive a predetermined amount each pay cheek, and that the amount is not subject to reduction due to variations in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.