96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5786, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9439, Pens. Plan Guide P 23923w Jimmy Pisciotta Robert Stevens Larry Anderson Walter Herbert Harry Trout James Horne, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Teledyne Industries, Inc. And Teledyne, Inc.

91 F.3d 1326 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5786 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9439, Pens. Plan Guide P 23923W Jimmy PISCIOTTA; Robert Stevens; Larry Anderson; Walter Herbert; Harry Trout; James Horne, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC.; and Teledyne, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-55862, CV-93-14-JNK. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996. Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Dale A. Hilmen, San Diego, California, for plaintiffs-appellants. Mark S. Pulliam and Kenneth M. Fitzgerald, Latham & Watkins, San Diego, California, for defendants-appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Judith N. Keep, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-14-JNK. Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and WARE, * District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 Appellants seek review of the district court's orders dismissing Appellants' seventh and eighth causes of action, granting summary judgment in favor of Teledyne Industries, Inc. And Teledyne, Inc. ("Teledyne") and denying Appellants' motion to amend their complaint to add a claim based on…