The Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, the Spokane Tribe of Indians v. Washington State, the State of Washington Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission
Opinion
Opinion
91 F.3d 1350 The SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WASHINGTON STATE, The State of Washington; Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington; Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington; Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, Defendants-Appellants. The SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON STATE, The State of Washington; Booth Gardner, Governor of the State of Washington; Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General of the State of Washington; Franklin L. Miller, Deputy Director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 92-35113, 92-35446. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 6, 1996. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Before: GOODWIN, SCHROEDER, and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges.ORDER 1 The Supreme Court's decision in Washington v. Spokane Tribe of Indians, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1410 , 134 L.Ed.2d 537 (1996), vacated and remanded this court's decision, reported at 28 F.3d 991 (9th Cir.1994), for reconsideration in light of Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, 517 U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1114 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996). In light of that…