Todd JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Arb CAMPBELL; Charles Gross; City of Newport Beach; Donald Strauss, Defendants-Appellees

Good Law
92 F.3d 951·96 Daily Journal DAR 9867·1996 WL 452992·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20195·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6032
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 199694-55408California1,414 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Plaintiff-appellant Todd Johnson brought a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging that Campbell, a police officer, used excessive force against him during the course of his arrest. The jury returned a verdict for the defense. On appeal, Johnson contends that the district court erred by refusing to question a juror about his sexual orientation when Johnson made a Batson objection to the defense’s peremptory challenge of the juror. See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct. 1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). We need not decide the question whether a challenge based on sexual orientation falls within the rule of Batson ; we assume for purposes of decision that it does. We nevertheless reject Johnson’s appeal, because he did not offer facts or circumstances that created an inference of purposeful discrimination. The district court therefore did not err in declining to question the juror about his sexual orientation.

I. BACKGROUND

During the voir dire, the judge asked the jurors about their past jury experiences. Two jurors had had recent jury experience in similar trials involving claims against police officers. The first juror stated that he had been on the jury in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.