United States ex rel. Brittle v. City of Phoenix

Good Law
33 F. App'x 360
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 22, 2002No. 01-15482; D.C. No. CV-99-01415-VAMCalifornia82 words

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Because this is a required element of the statutory cause of action, entry of judgment against Relators was proper.

The district court correctly denied Relators’ motion for leave to amend as futile because, among other reasons, Relators’ evidence did not create a triable issue of fact as to scienter.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.