Barrett v. Sublett

Good Law
92 F.3d 1191·1996 WL 441743·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27884
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199695-17172California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1191 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jean-Paul BARRETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Sam SUBLETT; Major Soulvie; Ed Fiser, Major; George Cornveaux; CSO Minor; Bill Dzeadura; Ann Reeder; Lt. Moen; Abe Kakar; Sgt. Pickard; Ann Zimmerman; Investigator Lacky; OCS Sabitini; Juli Buck; Sergeant Streeper, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17172. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jean-Paul Barrett, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's sua sponte dismissal of Barrett's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials were deliberately indifferent to his safety when they refused to place him in protective custody after he was stabbed, beaten, and threatened by members of a prison gang. Barrett sought an injunction compelling prison officials to place him in protective segregation. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.