Baker v. Jefferson

92 F.3d 1191 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert BAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Paul D. JEFFERSON; Julio Mateo, Jr.; Mukesh Advani; Vivien Bronshvag; Margaret Debeers Brown; Martha C. Byrnes, Robert De Aztlan; Patrick R. Dixon; Yonkel N. Golstein, George G. Gowgani, PhD,; John C. Hisserick; James B. Hussey; Teri L. Jackson; Marilyn J. Mackett; J. Alfred Rider; Patricia Maria Villalobos, individually and in their official capacity as members of The Committee of Bar Examiners of the State of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56600. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Baker, an attorney, appeals the district court's order dismissing part of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and finding that the remainder of Baker's action was barred by res judicata. Baker sued…