Dinardo v. Romeo
Opinion
Opinion
92 F.3d 1191 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Deborah DINARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Beresford ROMEO, a/k/a Jazzie B.; Soul II Soul; 10 Records; Virgin Music Publishers, Ltd., a foreign corporation; Virgin Music, Inc., a corporation; Virgin Records America, Inc., a corporation; Atlantic Records, a corporation; Silent Productions, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56869. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Deborah DiNardo appeals pro se the district court's judgment for the defendants following a four week trial in which the jury concluded defendants did not breach DiNardo's copyright to a musical composition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we dismiss. 3 DiNardo contends the district court erred by granting the defendants motion in limine to exclude evidence of a tape recording. To preserve…