Boyne v. Politis

92 F.3d 1191 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur BOYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael POLITIS; State Attorney of Volusia County; David Damore; Volusia County; Sheriff, Volusia County; Samuel Lewis; Humana Hospital; David Morgan; Richard Albrecht; Leonard Barrow; Linda Barrow; Harry K. Singletary; Robert Porter; Dale Grim, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15604. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur Boyne, a prisoner originally incarcerated in Florida and temporarily transferred to Arizona, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 1 3 Boyne contends that the district court erred by dismissing the Florida defendants for lack of personal jurisdiction. 2 We review de novo the district court's determination of personal…