Ali v. Gomez

92 F.3d 1191 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Khalif A. ALI, aka Donald Perkins, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director, Defendant, and Robert Harway, Chief Medical Officer; L. Blair; K. Sather; Osgood, Dr., N. Brown; Mr. Battalini, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15567. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge; SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Khalif Abdul-Malik Ali, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials and medical staff in Ali's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging, inter alia, deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's summary judgment de novo, see McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm. 3 To the extent Ali contends the district court erred by…