City of Vernon v. Southern California Gas Company
Opinion
Opinion
92 F.3d 1191 1996-1 Trade Cases P 71,365 , Util. L. Rep. P 14,099 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. CITY OF VERNON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-56174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 8, 1996. Decided March 27, 1996. Before: BEEZER, BRUNETTI, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judges. 1 ORDER * 2 The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED on the basis of the attached order of August 4, 1994 of the district court. ATTACHMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 City of Vernon, Plaintiff, 4 v. 5 Southern California Gas Company, Defendant. No. CV 92-3435-SVW (CTx) Filed Aug. 4, 1994 6 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FEDERAL CLAIM 7 AND DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIM FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION 8 WILSON, District Judge. 9 The Court hereby dismisses Plaintiff's federal antitrust claim with prejudice under the "state action" doctrine. The…