Mark F. Broer v. Mark Mann Chase Riveland Kathryn Bail John Ladenburg William Honeysett Charles E. Robbins Michael Gilbert Stan Mowre, Sgt Veltry Johnson Dennis Marsh Pamela Maddess Ruben Cedeno David Savage Mark Wesner Ian Remme John Doe Impett, Correctional Officer C O Messer, Correctional Officer John MacH Correctional Officer Ray Fjetland

Good Law
92 F.3d 1191·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27901
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199694-35260California627 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1191 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark F. BROER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark MANN; Chase Riveland; Kathryn Bail; John Ladenburg; William Honeysett; Charles E. Robbins; Michael Gilbert; Stan Mowre, Sgt; Veltry Johnson; Dennis Marsh; Pamela Maddess; Ruben Cedeno; David Savage; Mark Wesner; Ian Remme; John Doe Impett, Correctional Officer; C O Messer, Correctional Officer; John Mach, Correctional Officer; Ray Fjetland, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 93-35867, 94-35260. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In appeal no. 93-35867, former Washington state prisoner Mark Frederick Broer, who is currently civilly confined pursuant to the Washington Sexually Violent Predators Act, Wash.Rev.Code §§ 71.09.010-71.09.902 (1994), appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendants in Broer's 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.