Marvin Dee Hedger v. Arvon J. Arave, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution

Good Law
92 F.3d 1192·1996 WL 442516·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28157
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199696-35188California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1192 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Marvin Dee HEDGER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Arvon J. ARAVE, Warden, Idaho Maximum Security Institution, Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-35188. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Idaho state prisoner Marvin D. Hedger appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation filed on July 14, 1995, which was adopted in full by the district court on November 29, 1995. See Coleman v. Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 750 (1991); Hedger v. Idaho, 855 P.2d 886 (Id.Ct.App.1993) (concluding Hedger's constitutional claims were procedurally barred by his failure to raise them on prior direct appeal). AFFIRMED. 1 * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.