Randolph D. Hill, Sr. v. Richard Kirkland, Washoe County 1-10 Does

92 F.3d 1192 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randolph D. HILL, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard KIRKLAND, Washoe County 1-10 Does, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 12, 1996. Decided July 23, 1996. Before: REINHARDT and HALL, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. * ORDER The appellant appeals the district court's order denying his request for a preliminary injunction to bar enforcement of N.R.S. §§ 211.241 to 211.249, which he contends is unconstitutional on its face. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Counsel acknowledged at oral argument that Hill had not been deprived of good time and had not been required to reimburse the county for the costs of his incarceration. Hill has suffered no injury, and any threat of injury is highly speculative. 1 Accordingly, we conclude that he cannot show that he is in danger of sustaining an injury that is…