Kowalski v. Oregon State Bar

Good Law
92 F.3d 1192·1996 WL 441767·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28128
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199695-35210California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1192 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Richard KOWALSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Bernard Otis Hooper; Thearl Eugene Dummitt, Plaintiffs, v. OREGON STATE BAR; Wade Bettis; Janet Pryce; Theodore Kulongoski; Joseph V. Ochoa; Robert Lau; Wallace Carson, Jr; Bill Bradsbury; Larry L. Campbell; Robert B. Abrams; J.F. Olsen; Barbara Roberts; Does 1-25, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35210. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John Richard Kowalski, an Oregon state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his claims for lack of standing. After a de novo review of the record, see Crow Tribe of Indians v. Campbell Farming Corp., 31 F.3d 768, 769 (9th Cir.1994) cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1362 (1995), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court order filed on July 25, 1994.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.