Stanley Knapp, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Philip J. Gomez Douglas J. O'connor, Stanley Knapp, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Philip J. Gomez Douglas J. O'COnnOr Ernst & Whinney

Good Law
92 F.3d 1192·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28156
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 199694-56380California590 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1192 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Stanley KNAPP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip J. GOMEZ; Douglas J. O'Connor, Defendants-Appellants. Stanley KNAPP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Philip J. GOMEZ; Douglas J. O'Connor; Ernst & Whinney, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56380, 94-56381. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1996. * Decided July 23, 1996. Before: WALLACE, FERGUSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Gomez and O'Connor appeal from a general jury verdict holding them liable for violating the securities laws. This disposition resolves solely the issues raised by Gomez and O'Connor in their pro se appeal. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78aa and 28 U.S.C. § 1331 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 2 A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.