Ramos v. Committee of Bar Examiners of State Bar of California

92 F.3d 1193 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Benjamin J. RAMOS, dba University of Honolulu School of Law, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMITTEE OF BAR EXAMINERS OF the STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA; John Hisserich, Chair; Allan B. O'Connor, Director of Educational Standards, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16157. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge; SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Benjamin J. Ramos appeals the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging a violation of his right to procedural due process, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's dismissal for failure to state a claim de novo, Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Ins. Co., 23 F.3d 226, 228 (9th Cir.1994), and affirm. 3 Ramos contends that the district court erred by concluding…