Leonard R. Richardson v. Tana Wood Ingrid McGehee Gary Hilliard

92 F.3d 1193 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leonard R. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tana WOOD; Ingrid McGehee; Gary Hilliard, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35786. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Leonard Richardson, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that they violated his right to due process by placing him in administrative segregation for masturbating, and his right to privacy by allowing female correctional officers to view him from control booths and in the shower facilities. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1044 (9th Cir.1989). We review for abuse of discretion the…