Middendorf v. U.S. General Services Admin.

92 F.3d 1193 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Georgia L. MIDDENDORF, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, a Department of the United States Government; Paul Gallegos, in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-35077. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, No. CV 95-1891-TSZ; Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding. 2 W.D.Wash. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 This appeal from the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order ("TRO") comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We agree with the parties' contention that the denial of the TRO was tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction; therefore, we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1). See…