Oliver v. Gomez

92 F.3d 1193 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Anthony Wayne OLIVER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director of Corrections California State Prison; K.W. Prunty, Warden; Bobbie L. Reed, Ph.D.; Jacqueline Clarke; P.D. Washington, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55590. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Anthony Wayne Oliver, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in Oliver's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . After a de novo review of the record, see Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed April 3, 1995. AFFIRMED. 1 * The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without…