Sule v. FCI Sheridan

92 F.3d 1194 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Usman Shehu SULE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FCI SHERIDAN; Mr. Sandels, Captain; Mr. Palmquist, Executive Assistant to the Warden; L. Lederer, Psychologist of FCI Sheridan; R. Sharm, Case Manager 4B; Joseph Crabtree, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35971. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1996. * Decided July 23, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges and KING ** , District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 This is a pro se petition by a prisoner for money damages against prison officials for violations of his due process, First Amendment and Eighth Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment to the prison officials. We affirm. FACTS 4 On May 23, 1991, Usman Shehu Sule was charged with prison infractions and placed in a "Special Housing Unit" (SHU). Three days after Sule was placed in SHU, the charges against him were dropped when prison officials determined Sule…