United States v. E.J. Conner

92 F.3d 1194 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E.J. CONNER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-56691. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Nos. CV-95-01003-LCN, CR-92-00669-LCN; Leland C. Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding. S.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 E.J. Conner appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his jury conviction and his sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, and aiding and abetting possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846, and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . Conner contends that: (1) his conviction and sentence violate the Double Jeopardy Clause; and (2) the…