United States v. Antonio Solano Camacho

Good Law
92 F.3d 1194·1996 WL 419700·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28226
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 25, 199695-30313California947 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1194 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Solano CAMACHO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30313. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 9, 1996. Decided July 25, 1996. Before: REAVLEY, * REINHARDT, WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The defendant raises numerous challenges to the district court's pre-trial, trial, and sentencing rulings. We conclude that the defendant's claims are without merit and therefore affirm defendant's conviction and sentence. 3 The events in question began when two police officers went to the Bali Hai Motel to investigate a report that a maid had found a large sum of money under a guest's bed. The room in question and the adjacent room were registered under the same name. The officers were knocking on the door of the room where the money was found when Camacho emerged from the adjacent room. 4 The officers asked Camacho a series of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.