Frederick M. Stoughton v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General U.S. Postal Service Agency

Good Law
92 F.3d 1194·1996 WL 442218·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28204
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199695-55453California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1194 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Frederick M. STOUGHTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Postmaster General; U.S. Postal Service Agency, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55453. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1996. * Decided Aug. 5, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge; SCHROEDER and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Frederick M. Stoughton appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Stoughton's employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, see Washington v. Garrett, 10 F.3d 1421, 1428 (9th Cir.1993), and we affirm. 3 With respect to Stoughton's claims of retaliation and discrimination on the basis of disability, we conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment on the ground that Stoughton did not file a timely complaint with the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.