United States v. Louis Juan Diaz

Good Law
92 F.3d 1194·1996 WL 429101
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 199695-35724California1,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1194 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis Juan DIAZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-35724. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 8, 1996. Decided July 31, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Louis Juan Diaz appeals from the district court's order denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . 4 Section 2255 requires only that the district court give a claim " 'careful consideration and plenary processing, including full opportunity for presentation of the relevant facts.' " Watts, 841 F.2d at 277, quoting Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 82-83 (1977). We entrust the choice of method to the court's discretion. Id., citing Marchibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 495 (1962). Diaz did not allege that the district court failed to give careful consideration to the § 2255 motion and related…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.