Salvador Zavala-Zaragoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Opinion
Opinion
92 F.3d 1195 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Salvador ZAVALA-ZARAGOZA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70104. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 11, 1996. * Decided July 23, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Salvador Zavala-Zaragoza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge's order of deportation and dismissing the appeal based on its finding that Zavala was statutorily ineligible for suspension of deportation, voluntary departure, or waiver of inadmissibility under the Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA). We deny the petition for review. JURISDICTION 4 On April 24, 1996, Congress enacted the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. Included in the AEDPA…