Vincent Maxmilian Yee v. Hughes Aircraft Company, Larry Spicer, Terian Day, Gary Osborn, Frank Taormina, Steve Dorfman, Sue Hungate

92 F.3d 1195 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Vincent Maxmilian YEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGHES AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Larry Spicer, Terian Day, Gary Osborn, Frank Taormina, Steve Dorfman, Sue Hungate, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55204. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1996. Decided July 22, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges and MERHIGE, District Judge. * 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Vincent Maximilian Yee appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Hughes Aircraft Company, Larry Spicer, Terian Day, Gary Osborn, Frank Taormina, Steve Dorfman and Sue Hungate on Yee's action alleging that he was terminated from Hughes in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 . We affirm. DISCUSSION A. Time-Barred Claims 4 The district court granted a partial summary judgment against Yee because it determined that claims based on his 1989 and 1990 performance…