United States v. Real Property Described as Lot 18, Panos Anastasiou

92 F.3d 1195 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOT 18; et al., Defendants, Panos Anastasiou, Appellant. No. 93-35420. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 1, 1994. * Withdrawn from Submission Oct. 18, 1994. Resubmitted July 16, 1996. Decided July 18, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and BOOCHEVER. ORDER This case is ordered resubmitted as of July 16, 1996. MEMORANDUM ** Panos Anastasiou appeals pro se the district court's judgment ordering forfeiture of his real and personal property. 1. Jurisdiction The judgment of forfeiture in this case was entered on April 12, 1993. Anastasiou filed a notice of appeal on April 26, 1993. Four days later, on April 30, he moved to compel the government to pay interest on $31,000 turned over to the IRS subject to a levy for back taxes. The district court assumed jurisdiction and denied the motion. Anastasiou did not file…