Wallis By and Through Wallis v. Spencer

Good Law
92 F.3d 1195·1996 WL 413660·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28200
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 199694-56434California2,106 words

Opinion

Opinion

92 F.3d 1195 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lauren WALLIS, By and Through her Guardian Ad Litem; Rebecca Lynn WALLIS, Guardian Ad Litem; Jessie Wallis, By and Through his Guardian Ad Litem; William Lawrence Wallis, Guardian Ad Litem Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Mary SPENCER, M.D.; Candace Young, Ph.D.; City of Escondido; Cathy McLennan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56434. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1996. Decided July 23, 1996. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges; VAN SICKLE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Lauren Wallis, by and through her guardian ad litem, Rebecca Lynn Wallis, and Jessie Wallis, by and through his guardian ad litem, William Lawrence Wallis, appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Escondido and the dismissal of Dr. Mary Spencer in the Wallis family's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging that the defendants violated their civil rights by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.