96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6094, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9962 United States of America v. Miguel Polanco

Bad Law
93 F.3d 555·1996 WL 459858
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 199695-50341California6,374 words

Opinion

Opinion

93 F.3d 555 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6094 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9962 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel POLANCO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50341. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 10, 1996. Decided Aug. 15, 1996. H. Dean Steward, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Santa Ana, California, for defendant-appellant. S. Robert Raskin, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Santa Ana, California, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-95-00023-GLT-1. Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, * District Judge. MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge: 1 Miguel Polanco appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, on two counts of being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). He raises four issues on appeal. He first challenges the district court's reliance on the doctrine of inevitable discovery as a basis for admitting the Mirandized, inculpatory statement he made following his earlier, non-Mirandized inculpatory statement. His next…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.