UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto Escobar FLORES, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
93 F.3d 587·96 Daily Journal DAR 10045·1996 WL 467085·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 20642·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6161
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 19, 199694-30328California2,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

Defendant Roberto Escobar Flores, who pleaded guilty to two counts of maintaining and controlling a place for the purpose of manufacturing controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 856 , appeals his sentence of 51 months. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We conclude that the district court clearly erred by denying Flores a two-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and that it miscalculated his criminal history points. We vacate Flores’ sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with this opinion.

I. ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY

A. Factual Background

Flores pleaded guilty to two counts of a five-count indictment, and the government agreed to dismiss the other charges; Flores entered the plea two months after being indicted. At his presentence interview, Flores did not discuss the offense with the probation officer, but instead submitted a short statement a few weeks later, in June 1994, which said:

The officer found this statement was “generic,” inadequate, and not warranting a de crease in offense level for acceptance of responsibility. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 (Nov. 1990) (If defendant “clearly demonstrates a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.