96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6187, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,127 Separation of Church and State Committee Jeff Lewis Jimi Mathers v. City of Eugene of Lane County, State of Oregon, a Municipal Corporation

Good Law
93 F.3d 617
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 199693-35094California6,746 words

Opinion

Opinion

93 F.3d 617 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6187 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,127 SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE COMMITTEE; Jeff Lewis; Jimi Mathers, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF EUGENE OF LANE COUNTY, STATE OF OREGON, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-35094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1994. Decided Aug. 20, 1996. Charles O. Porter, Eugene, Oregon, for plaintiffs-appellants. William F. Gary, Harrang, Long, Watkinson, Laird & Rubinstein, Eugene, Oregon, for defendant-appellee. David Schuman and Allen L. Johnson, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Oregon, Eugene, for amicus ACLU. Steven K. Green, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Silver Springs, Maryland, for amicus Americans United. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-91-06164-MRH. Before LAY, * PREGERSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge O'SCANNLAIN. PER CURIAM. 1 In this second of two similar cases, 1 we must decide whether the City of Eugene, Oregon violates the Establishment Clause of the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.