96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6256, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,256 in Re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Human Rights Litigation. Maximo Hilao, Class v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, Republic of the Philippines, a Non-Party Specifically Identified as Subject to the Preliminary Injunction, in Re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Human Rights Litigation. Maximo Hilao, Class v. Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, Republic of the Philippines, a Non-Party Specifically Identified as Subject to the Preliminary Injunction

94 F.3d 539 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6256 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,256 In re ESTATE OF FERDINAND MARCOS HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION. Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant, Republic of the Philippines, a non-party specifically identified as subject to the preliminary injunction, Appellant. In re ESTATE OF FERDINAND MARCOS HUMAN RIGHTS LITIGATION. Maximo HILAO, Class Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. ESTATE OF Ferdinand MARCOS, Defendant, Republic of the Philippines, a non-party specifically identified as subject to the preliminary injunction, Appellant. Nos. 94-16739, 95-15259. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 13, 1995 in No. 94-16739. Submitted June 18, 1996 * in No. 95-15259. Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Stephen V. Bomse, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, California, for appellant in Nos. 94-16739, 95-15259. Robert A. Swift, Kohn, Swift & Graf, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Jon M. Van Dyke, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellees in Nos. 94-16739, 95-15259. John Schnitker, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the amicus in No. 94-16739.…