Armstrong v. Mazurek

Good Law
94 F.3d 566·96 Daily Journal DAR 10481·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22014·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6339
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 27, 199695-35962California1,378 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 566 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6339 John H. ARMSTRONG, M.D.; Mark Miles, M.D.; Susan Wicklund, M.D.; Susan Cahill, P.A.; Mark Stranahan; Mary Thompson, M.D.; Edwin Stickney, M.D.; on Behalf of themselves and their patients throughout Montana, the surrounding states and Canada and on behalf of a class of performing and referring physicians, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Joseph MAZUREK, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-35962. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 28, 1996. Decided Aug. 27, 1996. Janet Benshoof and Simon Heller, The Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, New York City; Bruce Measure, Law Offices of Ambrose Measure, Kalispell, Montana; Turner Graybill, Graybill, Ostrem, Warner and Crotty, Great Falls, Montana, for plaintiffs-appellants. Clay R. Smith and Elizabeth Baker, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana, for defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Paul G. Hatfield, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-83-PGH. Before: PREGERSON, CANBY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 James H. Armstrong, M.D., Susan Cahill and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.