UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon Montes CASTANEDA, Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
94 F.3d 592·96 Daily Journal DAR 10593·1996 WL 490348·45 Fed. R. Serv. 729·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22692
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 199695-30259California2,075 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

This appeal requires us to review the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence where the district court has found sentencing entrapment.

Ramon Montes Castaneda timely appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to distribute cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. We affirm Castaneda’s conviction.

I

Working with Agent Robert Kursar of the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”), confidential informants Richard Orestad and Darrell Beck initiated purchases of cocaine through Theresa Sullivan, who lived with Or-estad and Beck. Until her arrest, Sullivan did not know that Kursar was a DEA agent.

According to Sullivan’s trial testimony, Castaneda supplied her with cocaine on numerous occasions. Sullivan and Orestad testified that, after one failed transaction, Castaneda agreed to provide them with one kilogram of cocaine. Orestad testified that he went to Castaneda’s residence, where he met Castaneda, Graciela Becerra and Jose Abel Ramirez. Castaneda opened Becerra’s purse and showed Orestad one kilogram of cocaine inside.

According to Orestad, he told Castaneda…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.