Bahinipaty v. Educational Medical, Inc.

Good Law
94 F.3d 650·1996 WL 465763·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37489
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 14, 199695-55487California221 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lingaraj BAHINIPATY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDUCATIONAL MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation; Maric College of Medical Careers, a subsidiary of EMI; Gary Kerber; Vince Pisano; Gerry Taylor; Lee Haroun, et al. and DOES 1 to 50, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55487. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 8, 1996. * Decided Aug. 14, 1996. Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 A Court of Appeals reviews an award of sanctions under the inherent power of the district court for an abuse of discretion. Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 55 , 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2138 , 115 L.Ed.2d 27 (1991). After a careful review of the record and consideration of the briefs submitted by the parties, we AFFIRM the district court's award of sanctions. * The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.