Attorneys Trust v. Videotape Computer Products, Inc.

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. ATTORNEYS TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant, and CMC Magnetics Corporation aka CMC, a Republic of China Corporation, Cross-defendant-Appellant, v. VIDEOTAPE COMPUTER PRODUCTS, INC., for itself & dba Video Computer Products, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Videotape Products, Inc., Cross-claimant-Appellee. No. 95-55410. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 11, 1996. Decided Aug. 20, 1996. 1 Before: FERNANDEZ and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Attorneys Trust, assignee for collection, commenced this action against Videotape Products, Inc. (VTP) to collect a debt allegedly owed to CMC. VTP, in turn, cross-complained against CMC for breach of warranty in the sale of certain videotape housings. After the district court found in favor of VTP and entered judgment against AT and CMC, they appealed. They claim that the district court had no subject…