Charles S. Bowser v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correction Institution, Sheridan, Oregon

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles S. BOWSER, Petitioner-Appellant v. Joseph CRABTREE, Warden, Federal Correction Institution, Sheridan, Oregon Respondent-Appellee. No. 96-35461. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 15, 1996. * Decided Aug. 20, 1996. Sur Petition for Panel Rehearing Oct. 29, 1996. Before: ALDISERT ** , PREGERSON and T.G. Nelson, Circuit Judges. ORDER The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. However, because this case is now ripe for consideration on the merits, we REMAND so that the district court may consider the issue of entitlement to sentence reduction. BEFORE: ALDISERT, PREGERSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING 1 Oct. 29, 1996. 2 Before us for decision is a petition for panel rehearing. When this case was previously before us, on August 20, 1996, we affirmed the district court's judgment that the petition for habeas corpus relief was not ripe because…