Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,317

Good Law
94 F.3d 650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 199636-3California1,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 650 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,317 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Christopher and Jane Doe BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BENCHMARK POWER CORPORATION, Defendant, and Carrington Energy Development Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. 1 No. 95-35578. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 8, 1996. * Decided Aug. 12, 1996. 3 Before: BEEZER and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and BROWNING, District Judge. ** 4 MEMORANDUM *** 5 Plaintiffs Christopher and Jane Doe Brown, et al., appeal the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the accounting firm Deloitte & Touche. Plaintiffs asserted a claim in their Third Amended Complaint 1 against Deloitte for securities fraud under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78 (j). The district court granted summary judgment, and Plaintiffs timely appeal. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 6 * We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.