Brown

Brown v. City of Santa Ana

Good Law
94 F.3d 650
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 15, 1996650California566 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Darryl BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA ANA; Paul M. Walters, T. Ahearn (# 1385), W. Letizio (# 1614), Deakins (# 1448), in both their personal and official capacities, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55433. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 5, 1996. Decided Aug. 15, 1996. Before: D.W. NELSON, T.G. NELSON, THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Darryl Brown appeals the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the City of Santa Ana, Santa Ana Police Chief Paul M. Walters, Officer T. Ahearn, and Officer W. Letizio. Brown alleges that (1) the City is liable under Monell v. Dep't of Social Serv. of City of N.Y., 436 U.S. 658 (1978); (2) the individual defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity; and (3) his motion to compel production of photographs should have been granted. We affirm in part and reverse in part. 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.