Laszlo Miklos Csoka v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Laszlo Miklos CSOKA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 95-70253. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Laszlo Miklos Csoka, a native and citizen of Hungary, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of his motion to reopen deportation proceedings to consider his applications for a waiver of inadmissability under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (c), and for adjustment of status under section 245 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. § 1255 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 We review the BIA's denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 105 (1988). The denial of a motion…