Gregory Allen Chavers v. R. Hernandez R.R. Rath T. Van Dyke K. Hair, Officer R.W. Crum Gray Does 1-13, Inclusive

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Gregory Allen CHAVERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. HERNANDEZ; R.R. Rath; T. Van Dyke; K. Hair, Officer; R.W. Crum; Gray; Does 1-13, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56257. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Gregory Allen Chavers, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Chavers contends that the defendants: (1) violated Chavers' constitutional rights by using excessive and unjustified force, (2) violated 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 , 1986 by conspiring against Chavers and failing to prevent a conspiracy, (3) violated California regulations by pointing a gun at Chavers and by wrongfully issuing a "serious rule violation." We review de novo the district court's grant of…