Mirela Dencker v. Terrance Marren Robert Gaston Gloria Sanchez Claus Dencker George W. Foley, Sr.

Good Law
94 F.3d 650·1996 WL 478812·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 37473
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 22, 199696-15120California401 words

Opinion

Opinion

94 F.3d 650 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mirela DENCKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terrance MARREN; Robert Gaston; Gloria Sanchez; Claus Dencker; George W. Foley, Sr., Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 22, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Mirela Dencker appeals the district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of her complaint against her former husband's attorney in Nevada state family court proceedings and against three state court judges, at least two of whom presided over those proceedings. 3 The district court properly dismissed the claims against Judge Gloria Sanchez because the complaint cites no specific actions by Judge Sanchez. The district court properly dismissed the claims for injunctive relief against Judges Robert Gaston and Terrance Marren under the abstention doctrine enunciated in Younger…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.