Greyson v. Reno
Opinion
Opinion
94 F.3d 651 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Malcolm GREYSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Janet RENO, United States Attorney General; Elliott Enoki, Interim United States Attorney; Michael Kawahara, Assistant U.S. Attorney; Robert Marks, State Attorney General; Keith M. Kaneshiro, Prosecuting Attorney, City & County of Honolulu; Guy Hall, Administrator, Oahu Community Correctional Center; State of Hawaii, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-16970. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 16, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Malcolm Greyson, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 requesting that the United States Attorney General credit toward his federal sentence the time Greyson spent in state custody pursuant to a pre-trial federal detainer. As Greyson acknowledges in his brief, this…