Kenneth L. Krause David R. Bean Edward F. Wills v. Russ Hebert William Palzcewski Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc.

94 F.3d 651 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth L. KRAUSE; David R. Bean; Edward F. Wills, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Russ HEBERT; William Palzcewski; Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15328. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1996. * Decided Aug. 16, 1996. Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Nevada state prisoners Kenneth L. Krause, David R. Bean, and Edward F. Wills, (collectively "appellants") appeal pro se the district court's summary judgment for prison officials and Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc. ("CDC") in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials and CDC retaliated against them for engaging in constitutionally protected activity. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 1 and affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994)…