James v. Southern California Edison Co.

94 F.3d 651 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Glen JAMES; Doreth James, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY; San Diego Gas & Electric Company; Combustion Engineering, Inc.; Does 1 Through 100, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56842. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996. Decided Aug. 15, 1996. 1 Before: GOODWIN and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges, and WARE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Plaintiffs-appellants Glen and Doreth James appeal the district court's entry of final judgment and its denial of plaintiffs' motion for a new trial following a jury verdict in favor of defendants-appellees Southern California Edison (SCE), San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDG & E), and Combustion Engineering, Inc. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm. 4 1. The district court's dismissal of plaintiffs' breach of implied warranty claim 5 Privity is generally a…